Statue of liberty logo
Skip to main content.

Why you should care

The Pennsylvania Ballot Access Coalition in seeking more choices for all of us on Election Day. Current Pennsylvania law makes it difficult for independent and minor party candidates to appear on the ballot — much more difficult than in most other states. The result is less political competition, less political dialog, and fewer choices to vote for in November. The current system is simply not fair and does a great disservice to the ideal of democracy and to the voters. What you can do about it.

The trainwreck of 2006

In 2006, independent and minor party candidates were required to collect over 67,000 valid signatures simply to get on the state-wide ballot in Pennsylvania on Election Day. Legally, Democratic and Republican candidates require no signatures to get on the state-wide ballot, and even the 2,000 signatures required for the Primary Day ballot are ridiculously smaller than the virtually impossible hurdle of 67,000.

The solution

Pennsylvania law needs to be changed by the State Legislature to lower the outrageous signature requirements. The Coalition has drafted a Voters' Choice Act and is seeking sponsorship of it in the General Assembly.

Josh Shapiro reneges on promise to support fair and equal elections

This letter was printed Jan 27, 2007 in the Bucks County/Montgomery County Intelligencer, but with one error: the fine was either $80K (or possibly $160K; we're not yet certain), and not $1,000,000! The author, Ken Krawchuk, is a leading member of the PA Ballot Access Coalition. He was the Libertarian candidate for Pennsylvania Governor in 1998 and 2002 and is a past chair of the Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania.


To the Editor:

	State Representative Josh Shapiro advancing the cause of good government?
That'll be the day!  Your editorial last Sunday missed the mark by miles.
I can tell you from personal experience that Shapiro is more the typical
flip-flopping politician than rising star.

	About a year ago, I contacted him regarding badly-needed ballot access
reform in Pennsylvania.  Did you know that last year the law required only
2,000 signatures for a Democrat or Republican to get on the statewide
ballot, but third parties and independents needed over 67,000?  This
atrocious law flies in the face of the constitutional mandate that "All
elections shall be free and equal".  Fortunately, there is a cure for this
bad ballot situation, the Voters' Choice Act (www.PaBallotAccess.org)
which would restore the equality of elections.

	As a sitting member of the House State Government committee, Shapiro was
in the perfect position to advance the cause of good government, so I
personally delivered a copy of the Act to him and asked if he would
support it.  He replied in writing (sic): "I support Free and Equal
elections and I will vote in favor of the Voters' Choice Act."  Yeah,
right.  Less than two months later, once hearings for the bill began, he
changed his tune and refused to support the Act at all.  He still refuses.

	One doesn't have to look very far to find out why.  Last year there was
only one third-party candidate who had the moxie to climb that 67,000
signature wall, but Shapiro and his fellow Democrats would have nothing of
it.  They pounced on his petitions and had him thrown off the ballot for
their own specious, self-serving reasons.  Worst of all, they then fined
the would-be candidate over $80,000 dollars for having the
temerity to attempt to give Pennsylvania voters a third choice.

	Where was Mr. "Good Government" Shapiro?  Did he raise his voice in
protest?  Of course not.  No doubt he was out celebrating with his fellow
Democrats and slapping each other on the backs for having choked off
democracy at the ballot box so thoroughly.

	Pardon me, but this sort of behavior won't wash.  Either you're in favor
of good government or you're not, and Shapiro has now twice weighed in on
the topic, both times on the wrong side.  If he can be seen as a "rising
star", then darkness must certainly have fallen in Pennsylvania.

	Thirteen years ago, I ran for the very same state rep seat now occupied
by Shapiro.  Given his continued rejection of good government and his lack
of the basic decency democracy demands, perhaps the time has come for me
to give it another try.  Or will he simply threaten to fine me a million
bucks too?


Ken V. Krawchuk
Abington